Jules Hurst
Pentagon comptrollerSaid the department has no final number for installation damage, and that it depends on how it decides to rebuild, or if it does6.
What to watch
- Any cost figure in the next budget request.
Source: Middle East Monitor, August 18th, 20261
The Pentagon has not decided which damaged Middle East bases to rebuild, and it has published no cost for the damage. A senior defense official said on October 20th, 2026 that the department is assessing installations with Central Command (CENTCOM) and weighing the future global posture2. The official had no cost estimate readily available2.
The reporting describes two broad choices: rebuild and harden in the Gulf, or move capability west. Defence Security Asia reports that destinations include western Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Israel and southern Europe3. One analysis reads the most credible outcome as selective reconstruction with dispersal4.
The evidence supports a mixed result more than a withdrawal. David Vine argues in The Nation that the era of US bases in the Middle East is ending5. The Defence Security Asia analysis warns that Iran has gained a hold over exposed sites without gaining control of Gulf access3.
The choice is about how the United States fights in the Gulf, and the department has said little about it.
On October 20th, 2026 a senior defense official told reporters that the department is meeting with CENTCOM and doing installation assessments, and that part of the question is what the future global posture requires2. The official did not have a cost estimate readily available2. Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee had asked the department that week to disclose the total cost of the war, including damage to bases2.
Pentagon comptroller Jules Hurst said in April that the department had no final number for damage to overseas installations. He said the figure depends on how the department decides to rebuild, or if it does6. In August a senior Pentagon official said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had not ordered a formal review1.
Figures from a Defense Priorities explainer, rounded as published
Source: Defense Priorities, July 9th, 20257
Strikes reportedly made the Combined Air Operations Center at Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar inoperable and hit installations in Saudi Arabia and Jordan2. Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao acknowledged heavy damage at Bahrain, and Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle said the Navy would not use Naval Support Activity Bahrain soon2.
The Nation counts 18 US military deaths in the war as of July 30th, 20265. Defence Security Asia reports the destruction of more than 200 US facilities, a figure this piece has not been able to verify3.
Said the department has no final number for installation damage, and that it depends on how it decides to rebuild, or if it does6.
Said the Navy would not use Naval Support Activity Bahrain soon2.
Writes that the era of scores of US bases in the Middle East will almost certainly end5.
Defence Security Asia also reports that damage in Kuwait, Bahrain and Al Udeid pushed more naval resupply toward Diego Garcia, and that some transit times about tripled, according to accounts it does not name3. One analysis in the same outlet reads the most credible outcome as selective reconstruction combined with dispersal4.
A Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) estimate published April 21st, 2026 puts Patriot interceptor use in the war at between 1,060 and 1,430. The prewar inventory was 2,330, with a delivery timeline of 42 months10.
US dollars, millions per missile, per CSIS from FY 2026 budget documents
Source: CSIS, April 21st, 202610
Vine writes that the military has at least 80 installations across the region and that the damage argues for ending the era of US bases5. A retired general, Barry McCaffrey, assessed that US forces have probably permanently lost access to 15 Gulf bases, which Defence Security Asia describes as his judgment and not a Pentagon finding3.
The same analysis says his claim that Iran could control access should not be read literally. It argues that Iran has gained denial power over exposed sites, but its degraded conventional forces limit its ability to dominate the Gulf states3.
The reduction of the Gulf footprint was also an older goal. In 2024 the then CENTCOM commander, Gen. Michael Kurilla, described the command's mission as shifting from security guarantor to security integrator11.
Confidence is low to medium. Sources agree that no formal review exists and that no cost has been published6,4,2. Beyond that, the options come from press reports and one outlet's analysis, so the primary assessment rests on thin ground.
The strongest alternative is the one Vine makes, that closures should follow the damage5. It would gain weight if the Pentagon names a base it will not rebuild, or if a host government limits US use.
What would change this view: a published cost figure, a formal posture review, or a named base closure.