FERC publishes a notice of proposed rulemaking or notice of inquiry on negotiated or market-based rates for oil pipelines in a docket on ferc.gov.
A reported FERC plan to let oil pipelines negotiate fees has no docket, and the chairman denies it
D.C. Circuit
Liquid Energy Pipeline Association v. FERC 17 Sep 2024
The court vacated FERC's rehearing order on the oil pipeline index, and on September 17th, 2024 FERC reinstated the original, higher index1.
FERC
Index review proposal and remedial relief 20 Nov 2025
FERC proposed PPI-FG minus 1.42% for 2026 to 2031 and granted certain oil pipelines remedial relief for March 1st, 2022 to September 17th, 20242.
FERC
Five-year index review, final rule (RM26-6-000) 24 Apr 2026
FERC set the index at PPI-FG minus 0.55% for the five years from July 1st, 20263.
FERC
Order on clarification and motion for stay 15 Oct 2026
FERC clarified the November 20th, 2025 relief order and denied a motion to stay it pending judicial review4.
Source: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, October 15th, 20264
Fuel retailers are fighting a plan that FERC has not published. On October 22nd, 2026, NATSO, SIGMA and NACS urged the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to abandon any rulemaking that would let interstate oil pipelines negotiate rates one shipper at a time5. They say they represent 90 percent of fuel sold at retail5. The plan is known only through a Bloomberg report that relies on people who asked not to be named6.
The chairman says the reforms are not coming this year. Chairman Laura Swett said that such reforms are not on her agenda for this year, while confirming that she set up an oil task force to hear stakeholders on a variety of potential reforms6. A formal rulemaking would need the support of at least three of the five commissioners6.
The rate decisions FERC has actually made point the other way. On April 24th, 2026, FERC set the rate-ceiling index at the Producer Price Index for Finished Goods (PPI-FG) minus 0.55% for the five years from July 1st, 20263. That index, not negotiation, still governs most interstate oil pipeline rates7. Until a docket opens, the story is a dispute over an unpublished idea.
The legal and market risk is low until FERC opens a docket, and the cost risk is conditional on what a docket would contain.
LegalMediumFuel retailers say individual rates would breach the Interstate Commerce Act.
The three trade groups say the Interstate Commerce Act bars oil pipelines from discriminating between shippers and requires just and reasonable rates5. That is their argument, and we found no ruling on it for this plan.
RegulatoryLowNo proposal is published, and the chairman says reform is not on this year's agenda.
The plan is reported from unnamed sources6. Swett said such reforms are not on her agenda for this year6. A rulemaking needs three of five commissioners6.
EconomicMediumPipeline fees are a small part of pump prices, but the retail groups expect pass-through.
Swett has said pipeline transportation costs are a tiny fraction of the total price of fuel3. The retail groups say higher shipping costs would be passed on at the pump6. We found no published cost estimate for the reported plan.
ReputationalLowFERC is being asked to answer for a plan it has not announced.
Swett said some people are attempting to distort her position6.
InvestmentMediumPipeline owners and fuel buyers would reprice differently if the idea became a proposal.
The Liquid Energy Pipeline Association (LEPA) argues a simpler federal process could encourage investment in the pipeline system6. The retail groups say they can identify no stakeholder other than pipelines that would support the move6.
A FERC proposal on negotiated oil pipeline rates is unlikely within 90 days, and less likely than not within eight months.
Calibration. Confidence on the mechanism is medium: the reported plan and the chairman's denial are both on the record, but no FERC document describes it6. Confidence on the horizon is medium: Swett's statement covers this year only6.
Analyst assessment. Each call is scored once its date passes.
Swett's oil task force holds a public conference or issues a public notice seeking comment on oil pipeline rate reform, shown on ferc.gov.
FERC publishes a notice of proposed rulemaking on negotiated or market-based rates for oil pipelines in a docket on ferc.gov.
Watch For. The list below names each indicator and its public source.
- FERC's monthly open meeting agendas and summaries on ferc.gov, which list oil pipeline items by docket number.
- New filings in FERC's eLibrary from NATSO, SIGMA, NACS and LEPA on oil pipeline rate policy.
- Any FERC notice naming the oil task force or a technical conference.
- Statements by the other four commissioners on negotiated rates.
What has moved is a letter and a news report, not a FERC document.
The operational record has three parts. FERC finalized its index review on April 24th, 20263. FERC issued an order on October 15th, 2026 that clarified earlier relief and denied a stay4. The trade groups sent a letter and a press release on October 22nd, 20265. Only the first two are FERC acts, and neither concerns negotiated rates.
Reported, not proposed: the plan described by Bloomberg is not in any FERC document, and the Commission's October 2026 meeting summary lists no item on it4.
A four-year fight over the index set the background, and a news report and a letter opened the current dispute.
FERCLaura Swett
Chairman, FERCBloomberg's sources say she is playing a lead role in developing the proposal6. She says reforms of this kind are not on her agenda for this year6.
What to watch
- Whether the oil task force announces a public process.
- Whether she brings an oil rate item to a monthly open meeting.
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
Regulator of interstate oil pipeline ratesA rulemaking would need at least three of its five commissioners6. Commissioner Chang dissented from the April 2026 index and argued for PPI-FG minus 1.68%8.
What to watch
- Whether any commissioner comments on negotiated rates.
Fuel retailersNATSO, SIGMA and NACS
Trade groups for truck stops, fuel marketers and convenience storesThey say they represent 90 percent of fuel sold at retail and oppose any rulemaking on individually negotiated rates5.
What to watch
- Filings in FERC's eLibrary if a docket opens.
PipelinesLiquid Energy Pipeline Association
Trade group for oil pipeline operatorsLEPA's John Stoody says a simpler federal process could reduce delays and encourage investment6.
What to watch
- Whether LEPA files comments on rate policy.
The headline treats an unpublished idea as a decided policy and treats negotiated rates as new.
- Claim: FERC is moving to let pipelines set fees freely. Record: the plan is reported from unnamed sources, FERC has published nothing, and Swett says such reforms are not on her agenda for this year6.
- Claim: negotiated rates would be a new category. Record: a pipeline can already charge a settlement rate if all of its system shippers agree, and market-based rates exist where FERC finds a pipeline lacks market power7.
- Claim: higher pipeline fees would raise pump prices by a set amount. Record: the retail groups say prices would rise, Swett says transportation is a tiny fraction of fuel prices, and we found no figure for this plan6,3.
Fuel prices are high, so any change to how pipelines price transport draws attention from buyers and regulators.
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported US regular gasoline at $4.284 per gallon on October 19th, 2026, which is $1.265 above a year earlier9. On-highway diesel was $6.276 per gallon, up $2.656 over the year9. The retail groups say the federal government is taking extraordinary measures to bring prices down6.
Prices differ by region. West Coast regular gasoline averaged $5.557 per gallon and Gulf Coast regular gasoline $3.7849. A change in pipeline rates would reach buyers through delivery costs, which vary by route, so the effect would not be uniform. That is a reading of how pass-through works, not a finding from a source.
The index also reaches beyond FERC-regulated rates. Many intrastate pipelines and terminal operators have written the FERC method into their contracts to account for inflation7.
Fuel retailers and shippers carry the cost risk, and pipeline owners hold the upside, if a proposal appears.
Fuel retail and marketing
Pump margins and wholesale cost
Oil pipeline operators
Rate ceilings and investment returns
Refiners and other shippers
Transportation cost and access
No client needs to reprice today, and each reader should set a trigger for when a docket opens.
- PE and VC firms: map portfolio companies that buy fuel by pipeline-delivered volume, and note any contract that references the FERC index7.
- Family offices: treat midstream holdings as exposed to rate policy, with no change in cash flows until FERC acts.
- Corporates: ask fuel suppliers whether delivered prices include pipeline tariffs that follow the index7.
- Law firms: watch for a FERC docket on oil pipeline rates, and check clients' contracts for index-linked escalators and for rights on rate changes.
The useful questions are about contract terms, because the policy itself is not yet written.
- Contracts: which supply or transport agreements escalate with the FERC index, and which with a negotiated rate?
- Exposure: what share of delivered fuel cost is pipeline transport, and on which routes?
- Counterparties: does any pipeline counterparty say it is seeking individually negotiated rates?
- Regulation: has the company filed or planned comments with FERC on oil pipeline rate policy?
The evidence supports a narrow conclusion: a plan is being discussed, it is not on FERC's published agenda, and the cost effect is unmeasured.
Confidence: medium. The report rests on one outlet's anonymous sources6. The chairman's denial and the retailers' letter are both on the record6,5. We have not seen the plan.
Primary assessment: this is a Narrative Surge. The story rests on one news report and one trade-group letter, and no FERC document exists. The escalation test asks for formal policy action, and none has happened.
Strongest alternative reading: Swett's statement covers this year only, and she set up an oil task force to engage stakeholders on a variety of potential reforms6. A proposal could follow in 2027 without contradicting her.
What would make this call wrong: a FERC notice, docket or open meeting item on negotiated oil pipeline rates, or a named commissioner confirming the plan.
FERC already has four ways to set oil pipeline rates, and indexing is the main one.
Under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, FERC must keep a simplified ratemaking method for oil pipelines, and its 1993 Order No. 561 created the index7. The index lets pipelines change rates each year up to a ceiling without a cost filing7. It governs rate-ceiling adjustments for approximately 86% of interstate oil pipeline rates7.
The alternatives are cost-of-service rates, market-based rates and settlement rates7. Cost-of-service filings require a pipeline to show costs substantially diverse from the index7. Market-based rates need a FERC finding that the pipeline lacks enough market power to act as a monopoly7. A settlement rate needs agreement from all of the pipeline's system shippers7.
US regular gasoline price by region, October 19th, 2026
Dollars per gallon, EIA weekly survey
Source: US Energy Information Administration, October 20th, 20269
John Stoody of LEPA, the pipeline operators' trade group, gave Bloomberg the case for the other side on October 22nd, 2026.
A simpler federal process could reduce regulatory delays and encourage investment in America's pipeline system, while keeping rates fair and fuel delivery reliable.
Bloomberg6
- FERC Initiates Supplemental Rulemaking Seeking Comments on Oil Pipeline Index Levels Following Pipeline Victory at D.C. Circuit in LEPA v. FERC. Vinson & Elkins, October 18th, 2024
- FERC Clears the Deck on Lingering Oil Pipeline Matters and Issues New Indexing NOPR for the Next Five-Year Review. Vinson & Elkins, November 26th, 2025
- FERC Finalizes Five-Year Review of the Oil Pipeline Index. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, April 24th, 2026
- Summaries | October 2026 Commission Meeting. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, October 15th, 2026
- Fuel Retailers Encourage Federal Energy Commission to Abandon Plan That Would Force Consumers to Pay More for Gasoline and Diesel. NATSO, Inc., October 22nd, 2026
- US Fuel Sellers Warn on Prices Over Potential Pipeline Shift (Bloomberg, via Energy Connects). Bloomberg, October 22nd, 2026
- FERC Finalizes New Oil Pipeline Index for 2026-2031: Key Takeaways. Akin, April 28th, 2026
- FERC finalizes five-year review of oil pipeline rate index. White & Case, April 29th, 2026
- Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update. US Energy Information Administration, October 20th, 2026